Post by account_disabled on Feb 14, 2024 3:19:27 GMT -5
The victim to ransomware attacks. Photo: Rational actors on both sides of German Ltd. Even though it is mostly high-profile cases like MGM or MGM that end up making headlines, ransomware is a common phenomenon that particularly affects local mid-sized companies. Just as attackers choose the path of least resistance and focus on optimizing their cost-benefit ratio, companies often seek to pay to quickly end situations in which they are unable to act. Paying a ransom is always a sobering consideration, Michael Weisgerber emphasizes.
First you have to check if the payment is legitimate. There is of course no guarantee that the blackmailer will deliver and/or that the key will work. Yet the MGM example shows that such considerations generally still support payment. approximately $10,000 per Panama Email List day. If a failure is added to the ongoing costs the required ransom amount can quickly be reached. Typically takes less time than a full restore from backup. Of course you shouldn't pay the ransom but in practice sometimes it's not so easy to be so principled. If you don't have a backup you usually have no choice. Market participants have also observed an increasing rationality on the part of attackers.
Which has given rise to situations where ransom demands are enough to make payment more attractive than the laborious route via clic backup and recovery methods. Despite this experts clearly advise not to pay the ransom without even being sure whether you will get a valid recovery key from it. Additionally the attacker will then decide well this company is particularly worthy and come back a few months later. A combination of pragmatic protection and a clear response plan can minimize risk through efficient use of budgets. Yet businesses should be under no illusions that an almost adequate level of protection can be achieved without increasing overall investment. The industry as a whole agrees on this as the COVID-19.
First you have to check if the payment is legitimate. There is of course no guarantee that the blackmailer will deliver and/or that the key will work. Yet the MGM example shows that such considerations generally still support payment. approximately $10,000 per Panama Email List day. If a failure is added to the ongoing costs the required ransom amount can quickly be reached. Typically takes less time than a full restore from backup. Of course you shouldn't pay the ransom but in practice sometimes it's not so easy to be so principled. If you don't have a backup you usually have no choice. Market participants have also observed an increasing rationality on the part of attackers.
Which has given rise to situations where ransom demands are enough to make payment more attractive than the laborious route via clic backup and recovery methods. Despite this experts clearly advise not to pay the ransom without even being sure whether you will get a valid recovery key from it. Additionally the attacker will then decide well this company is particularly worthy and come back a few months later. A combination of pragmatic protection and a clear response plan can minimize risk through efficient use of budgets. Yet businesses should be under no illusions that an almost adequate level of protection can be achieved without increasing overall investment. The industry as a whole agrees on this as the COVID-19.